Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GT 240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 1624 days newer than GeForce GT 240.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 69 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 82% better in Need For Speed Unbound than GeForce GT 240 - 60 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 - 4 vs 1 GB
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$80 | MSRP | $1499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
54.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
550 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
850 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |