Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 2396 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 58 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 36% better in The Callisto Protocol than GeForce GT 220 - 68 vs 50 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 3 vs 1 GB
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
5.855086606489387%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
11.707317073170733%
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2016 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 10 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1506 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1708 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2002 MHz |
