Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 5100 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 2488 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 - 58 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Performs up to 35% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than GeForce GT 220 - 27 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
13.81294964028777%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
11.842105263157896%
Radeon Pro WX 5100
Desktop • Nov 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
34.75 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
121.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 18th, 2016 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 713 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1086 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
