Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3100 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is 2694 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Performs up to 10% better in DOOM Eternal than GeForce GT 220 - 140 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
24.615384615384613%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
36.91361189438606%
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
