Key Differences
In short — GeForce GT 220 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GT 220 is 2694 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 55042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
24.615384615384613%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
36.91361189438606%
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |