Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 4376 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 64% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GT 220 - 64 vs 39 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 50 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
6.435178978415336%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
12.868632707774799%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
