Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms GeForce 920MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1064 days newer than GeForce 920MX.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti - 16 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Performs up to 2300% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce 920MX - 24 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 920MX - 6 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
FPS
24
100%
Value, €/FPS
€22.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€531.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €531.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Mar 25th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Feb 22nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
---|---|---|
Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
965 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
993 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1770 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |