Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce 920MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 752 days older than GeForce 920MX.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 16 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 32% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than GeForce 920MX - 41 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 920MX - 3 vs 2 GB
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce 920MX
Mobile • Mar 25th, 2016
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
965 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
993 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
