The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the RTX 2000 Ada Generation. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 45 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of the RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
44
45%
Min 1% FPS
15
29%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Feb 12th, 2024
Average FPS
97
100%
Min 1% FPS
52
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
5%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
25%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
6%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Feb 12th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
102.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
187.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649.00 |
| HD Graphics (Haswell) | Generation | Workstation Ada (x000A) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 4.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 102.2 GPixel/s |
| 46 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 187.4 GTexel/s |
| 736 GFLOPS | FP32 | 12 TFLOPS |
