The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 45 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Average FPS
40
73%
Min 1% FPS
15
60%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, €
€181.54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.3/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€181.54
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Jun 3rd, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.6 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
46 GTexel/s
69%
FP32
736 GFLOPS
34%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.138 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 3rd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
HD Graphics | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
45 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
4.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 44.54 GPixel/s |
46 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 66.82 GTexel/s |
736 GFLOPS | FP32 | 2.138 TFLOPS |