The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the T400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
The T400 is better in every way
Advantages of the T400
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs T400
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
44
85%
Min 1% FPS
15
71%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
All items are out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs T400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs T400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs T400 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
70%
T400
May 6th, 2021
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
22.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
34.2 GTexel/s
71%
FP32
1.094 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | May 6th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Quadro Turing (Tx000) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| 30 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 80 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 4.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 22.8 GPixel/s |
48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 34.2 GTexel/s |
| 768 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.094 TFLOPS |
