The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Quadro GP100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 30 vs 235 Watts
Advantages of the Quadro GP100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Quadro GP100
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
44
45%
Min 1% FPS
15
28%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Quadro GP100
Oct 1st, 2016
Average FPS
97
100%
Min 1% FPS
53
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Quadro GP100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Quadro GP100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile vs Quadro GP100 in core GPU performance specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
15%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
7%
Quadro GP100
Oct 1st, 2016
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
732.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
138.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
323.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.34 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Quadro GP100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 1st, 2016 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
HD Graphics-M (Haswell) | Generation | Quadro Pascal (Px000) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 235 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 16 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | HBM2 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 4096-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 732.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
4.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 138.5 GPixel/s |
48 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 323.2 GTexel/s |
768 GFLOPS | FP32 | 10.34 TFLOPS |