Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is 2106 days newer than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Advantages of Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Consumes up to 95% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER - 15 vs 320 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
- Performs up to 406% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Iris Plus Graphics 655 - 248 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 - 16 vs 0 GB
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1402.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,402.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8594 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Apr 3rd, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
6.3 GPixel/s
2%
Texel Fillrate
50.4 GTexel/s
6%
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | vs | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $999 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 16 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR6X |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 736.3 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2295 MHz |
1050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2550 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1438 MHz |