Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 240 outperforms UHD Graphics 610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 240 is 2396 days older than UHD Graphics 610.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 240 - 15 vs 30 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than UHD Graphics 610 - 41 vs 40 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
41
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Apr 30th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
2.1 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
12.6 GTexel/s
90%
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 240 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
HD Graphics | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $69 |
Motherboard Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 650 MHz |
1050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1150 MHz |