Key Differences
In short — Iris Pro Graphics 580 outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Iris Pro Graphics 580 is 620 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon R7 250E - 62 vs 61 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 15 vs 55 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
8.55 GPixel/s
66%
Texel Fillrate
68.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
37%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |