Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 655 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260 is 1568 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 15 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Performs up to 36% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Iris Plus Graphics 655 - 15 vs 11 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Integrated • Apr 3rd, 2018
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Integrated • Apr 3rd, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
6.3 GPixel/s
39.375%
Texel Fillrate
50.4 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
95.23809523809524%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
