Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Iris Plus Graphics 640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 495 days older than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Iris Plus Graphics 640 - 361 vs 324 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
6.6 GPixel/s
10%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
20%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
