Key Differences
In short — HD Graphics 620 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing HD Graphics 620 is 1033 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 620
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 267 vs 266 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 15 vs 50 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
HD Graphics 620
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 620
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
3 GPixel/s
48.07692307692307%
Texel Fillrate
24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
77.99999999999999%
Intel HD Graphics 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | DDR3 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 730 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 780 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
