Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms HD Graphics 5500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 356 days newer than HD Graphics 5500.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 5500
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 69% better in Battlefield 2042 than HD Graphics 5500 - 71 vs 42 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
HD Graphics 5500
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 5500
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
2.55 GPixel/s
3%
Texel Fillrate
20.4 GTexel/s
7%
Intel HD Graphics 5500 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 850 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
