Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms HD Graphics 505 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 730 days older than HD Graphics 505.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 505
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 6 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than HD Graphics 505 - 54 vs 44 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.95 GPixel/s
6%
Texel Fillrate
11.7 GTexel/s
11%
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 505 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |