Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms HD Graphics 500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1400 days newer than HD Graphics 500.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 500
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 6 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 15% better in Deathloop than HD Graphics 500 - 47 vs 41 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
47
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€134
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €134 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Sep 1st, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
1.3 GPixel/s
6.274131274131274%
Texel Fillrate
7.8 GTexel/s
18.822393822393824%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 500 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
HD Graphics-T | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
650 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |