Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms HD Graphics 405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 337 days older than HD Graphics 405.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 405
- Consumes up to 99% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 6 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 225% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than HD Graphics 405 - 26 vs 8 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
HD Graphics 405
Integrated • Apr 1st, 2015
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 405 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 200 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 600 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
