Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 1948 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 51% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 89 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 65 vs 225 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
89
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€283.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €283.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
7%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$289 | MSRP | $199 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |