Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms HD Graphics 615 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 1968 days newer than HD Graphics 615.
Advantages of HD Graphics 615
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 5 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 83% better in Starfield than HD Graphics 615 - 22 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel HD Graphics 615 - 4 vs 0 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
HD Graphics 615
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 615
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
2.55 GPixel/s
3%
Texel Fillrate
20.4 GTexel/s
18%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
HD Graphics 615 | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 850 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
