The GeForce RTX 5090 D is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090 D
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 115 vs 575 Watts
GeForce RTX 5090 D vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 5090 D
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
243
100%
Min 1% FPS
167
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
20%
Min 1% FPS
21
13%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5090 D vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 5090 D vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 5090 D vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 5090 D
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
2260 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
2%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 5090 D | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 30th, 2025 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
| GeForce 50 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 575 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Memory | ||
32 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR7 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
2260 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
423.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
1637 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
104.8 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |
