The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 560 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only €992.05 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560
- Up to 85% cheaper – €169.99 vs €1162.04
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 75 vs 285 Watts
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
175
100%
Min 1% FPS
109
100%
Price, €
€1162.04
14%
Value, €/FPS
€6.64/FPS
49%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Average FPS
52
30%
Min 1% FPS
23
21%
Price, €
€169.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.26/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon RX 560 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
40.09 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 560
Apr 18th, 2017
Memory
4 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
22%
Pixel Fillrate
20.4 GPixel/s
10%
Texture Fillrate
81.6 GTexel/s
13%
FP32
2.611 TFLOPS
7%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 18th, 2017 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
| GeForce 40 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 285 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
12 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6X | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
504.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
208.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.4 GPixel/s |
626.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 81.6 GTexel/s |
40.09 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.611 TFLOPS |
