The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7500 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only €686.73 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7500
- Up to 59% cheaper – €475.31 vs €1162.04
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 70 vs 285 Watts
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
175
100%
Min 1% FPS
109
100%
Price, €
€1162.04
40%
Value, €/FPS
€6.64/FPS
85%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
84
48%
Min 1% FPS
45
41%
Price, €
€475.31
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.65/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7500 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
40.09 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon PRO W7500
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
172 GB/s
34%
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
52%
Texture Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
12.19 TFLOPS
30%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| $799.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
| GeForce 40 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 285 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
12 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6X | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
504.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
208.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 108.8 GPixel/s |
626.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 190.4 GTexel/s |
40.09 TFLOPS | FP32 | 12.19 TFLOPS |
