The GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a much slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 115 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Jan 29th, 2019
Average FPS
92
75%
Min 1% FPS
50
70%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€210.79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€210.79
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€262.52
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€229.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€347.56
In Stock
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Jan 29th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
92.16 GPixel/s
34%
Texture Fillrate
207.4 GTexel/s
39%
FP32
6.636 TFLOPS
39%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 20 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 92.16 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 207.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 6.636 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
