Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce MX330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 975 days newer than GeForce MX330.
Advantages of GeForce MX330
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 10 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Arc A750
- Performs up to 62% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than GeForce MX330 - 167 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX330 - 8 vs 2 GB
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Processor
Core i9-14900K
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€218.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €218.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3999 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Processor
Core i9-14900K
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Feb 10th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce MX330 | vs | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce MX | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | $289 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1531 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1594 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1752 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |