Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms GeForce MX130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 2008 days newer than GeForce MX130.
Advantages of GeForce MX130
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 30 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 6100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce MX130 - 62 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce MX130 - 16 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€602.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €602.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 692 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Nov 17th, 2017
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce MX130 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2017 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
GeForce MX | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
40.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1109 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
1189 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |