Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 980 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 980 is 1677 days older than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 980
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than GeForce GTX 1650 - 57 vs 54 FPS
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dead Space than GeForce GTX 980 - €4.02 vs €14.00 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 - 75 vs 165 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €798 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6989 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
54
95%
Value, €/FPS
€4.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6989 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 19th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 19th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
77.82 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
155.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
60%
GeForce GTX 980 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Sep 19th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$549 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
224.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1127 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1216 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |