The GeForce GTX 965M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4060. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 965M
The GeForce RTX 4060 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4060
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce RTX 4060 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Average FPS
51
46%
Min 1% FPS
23
37%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4060
May 18th, 2023
Average FPS
111
100%
Min 1% FPS
63
100%
Price, €
€332.91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€332.91
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€387.88
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€339.08
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€320.89
In Stock
GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce RTX 4060 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce RTX 4060 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 965M vs GeForce RTX 4060 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 965M
Jan 1st, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
80.19 GB/s
29%
Pixel Fillrate
36.8 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
73.6 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
0%
GeForce RTX 4060
May 18th, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
15.11 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 965M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4060 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 1st, 2016 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $299.00 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 115 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 272 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
36.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 118.1 GPixel/s |
73.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 236.2 GTexel/s |
0 GFLOPS | FP32 | 15.11 TFLOPS |