Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 960M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 2504 days newer than GeForce GTX 960M.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce GTX 960M - 370 vs 349 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 50 vs 75 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce GTX 960M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 960M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
18.82 GPixel/s
25%
Texel Fillrate
47.04 GTexel/s
42%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 960M | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 1097 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1176 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
