Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 765M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3156 days newer than GeForce GTX 765M.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 55% better in Alan Wake 2 than GeForce GTX 765M - 34 vs 22 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M - 50 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M - 4 vs 2 GB
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTX 765M
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 765M
Mobile • May 30th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
13.81 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
55.23 GTexel/s
49%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 765M | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 700M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 64.13 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 797 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 863 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1002 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
