The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 5700 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 60 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Average FPS
48
46%
Min 1% FPS
20
34%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX 5700 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Feb 18th, 2014
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
19%
Pixel Fillrate
17.36 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
43.4 GTexel/s
14%
FP32
1.389 TFLOPS
14%
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 18th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
GeForce 700 | Generation | Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
60 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
86.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
17.36 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 121.9 GPixel/s |
43.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 304.8 GTexel/s |
1.389 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.754 TFLOPS |