In Battlefield 6, the GeForce GTX 680 is much slower than the Radeon RX Vega 64. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce GTX 680
- Consumes up to 34% less energy – 195 vs 295 Watts
- Consumes up to 34% less energy
Radeon RX Vega 64
- Up to 5000% faster in Battlefield 6 – 51 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 5000% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Aug 07, 2017 vs Mar 22, 2012
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon RX Vega 64: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce GTX 680
Mar 22nd, 2012
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
192.3 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
33.86 GPixel/s
34%
Texture Fillrate
135.4 GTexel/s
34%
FP32
3.25 TFLOPS
26%
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce GTX 680 Mar 22nd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX Vega 64 Aug 7th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 22nd, 2012 | Released | Aug 7th, 2017 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Vega (RX Vega) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
195 W | Power Consumption | 295 W |
