Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 9100 outperforms GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 9100 is 2050 days newer than GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 - 210 vs 230 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro WX 9100
- Performs up to 26% better in Far Cry 5 than GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 - 125 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 1180% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 - 16 vs 1 GB
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Desktop • Nov 29th, 2011
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Desktop • Nov 29th, 2011
Pixel Fillrate
20.5 GPixel/s
21%
Texel Fillrate
40.99 GTexel/s
11%
Radeon Pro WX 9100
Desktop • Jul 10th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
96 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
384 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 | vs | Radeon Pro WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 29th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 10th, 2017 |
| GeForce 500 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
$289 | MSRP | $1599 |
| 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a | Outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
| 2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1.25 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM2 |
| 320-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
| 152 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
| 732 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1200 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
950 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |
