The GeForce GTX 480 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 480
The Arc A750 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 225 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 433% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 480 vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 480
Mar 26th, 2010
Average FPS
43
35%
Min 1% FPS
17
24%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€210.79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€210.79
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€262.52
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€229.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€347.56
In Stock
GeForce GTX 480 vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 480 vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 480 vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 480
Mar 26th, 2010
Memory
1.5 GB
19%
Memory Bandwidth
177.4 GB/s
35%
Pixel Fillrate
21.03 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
42.06 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
1.345 TFLOPS
8%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 480 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 250 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1.5 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 177.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 21.03 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 42.06 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 1.345 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
