The GeForce GTX 1660 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W5700 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only €128.95 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660
- Up to 20% cheaper – €514.84 vs €643.79
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 120 vs 205 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon Pro W5700 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660
Mar 14th, 2019
Average FPS
77
79%
Min 1% FPS
40
74%
Price, €
€514.84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.68/FPS
98%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, €
€643.79
79%
Value, €/FPS
€6.56/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon Pro W5700 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660
Mar 14th, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
192.1 GB/s
43%
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
71%
Texture Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
58%
FP32
5.027 TFLOPS
58%
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 14th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
$219.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 205 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 192.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 85.68 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 120.3 GPixel/s |
| 157.1 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.7 GTexel/s |
| 5.027 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.663 TFLOPS |
