Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 1239 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 75% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Radeon Pro WX 4100 - 28 vs 16 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Desktop • Nov 10th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
19.22 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
76.86 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399 |
| None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1201 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
