The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6400
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 53 vs 100 Watts
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
89%
Min 1% FPS
31
84%
Price, €
€212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.31/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€212.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€158.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€129.37
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€139.00
In Stock
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6400 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nov 22nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
55.2 GPixel/s
74%
Texture Fillrate
138 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.416 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
67%
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
81%
FP32
3.565 TFLOPS
81%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| $159.00 | MSRP | $159.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 100 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 55.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.27 GPixel/s |
138 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.4 GTexel/s |
4.416 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.565 TFLOPS |
