Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 1205 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon PRO W7500 - 30 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 401 vs 337 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
401
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€488.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €488.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
33%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
38%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Not Available | MSRP | $429 |
None | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |