Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 993 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile - 30 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Performs up to 92% better in Rust than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 196 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 16 vs 4 GB
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
14%
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1335 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1695 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
