Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1268 days newer than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 50% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 9 vs 6 FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti - 30 vs 75 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
6
67%
Value, €/FPS
€26.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€156.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €156.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
81%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
93%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1291 MHz |
1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1392 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1752 MHz |