The GeForce GTS 250 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTS 250
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 150 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTS 250
Mar 4th, 2009
Average FPS
46
27%
Min 1% FPS
19
18%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, €
€1822.86
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.72/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€1,822.86
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€1,020.34
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€860.36
In Stock
GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTS 250
Mar 4th, 2009
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
64.51 GB/s
11%
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
414.7 GFLOPS
2%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTS 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 10.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 43.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 414.7 GFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
