Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GT 640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3590 days newer than GeForce GT 640M.
Advantages of GeForce GT 640M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 32 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 115% better in Dishonored 2 than GeForce GT 640M - 56 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M - 4 vs 2 GB
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce GT 640M
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 640M | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 625 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
