Key Differences
In short — GeForce GT 435M outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GT 435M is 4022 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of GeForce GT 435M
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 35 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M - 4 vs 1 GB
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
GeForce GT 435M
Mobile • Jan 15th, 2011
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 435M | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 590 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
