Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms GeForce GT 425M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 3154 days newer than GeForce GT 425M.
Advantages of GeForce GT 425M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 23 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 95% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than GeForce GT 425M - 84 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M - 4 vs 1 GB
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7216 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 425M | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
GeForce 400M | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
560 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |