Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 4860 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 58 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 300% better in Starfield than GeForce GT 220 - 48 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 16 vs 1 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
48
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€558
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €558 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 220 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |