The GeForce 940M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc B570. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce 940M
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 75 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of the Arc B570
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 400% more VRAM memory – 10 vs 2 GB
GeForce 940M vs Arc B570 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce 940M
Mar 13th, 2015
Average FPS
42
34%
Min 1% FPS
16
23%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc B570
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
123
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€260.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€260.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€291.80
In Stock
GeForce 940M vs Arc B570 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 940M vs Arc B570 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 940M vs Arc B570 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 940M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
20%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
17.57 GPixel/s
9%
Texture Fillrate
35.14 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
1.124 TFLOPS
10%
Arc B570
Jan 16th, 2025
Memory
10 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
380 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
200 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
360 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
11.52 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 940M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 16th, 2025 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $219.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Battlemage |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 150 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 10 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 160-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 380 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 17.57 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 200 GPixel/s |
| 35.14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 360 GTexel/s |
| 1.124 TFLOPS | FP32 | 11.52 TFLOPS |
