In Battlefield 6, the GeForce 920M is much slower than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 33 vs 300 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Up to 10300% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 10300% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Oct 28, 2020 vs Mar 13, 2015
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 2 GB
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
GeForce 920M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2259.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$21.73/FPS
100%
![ASRock AMD Radeon RX6900XT Graphics Board GDDR6 16GB [Domestic Authorized Dealer] RX RX 6900 XT PG D 16G OC](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/gpus/B08QYQH7QW.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
GeForce 920M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
GeForce 920M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: Comparison of core performance specifications
GeForce 920M
Mar 13th, 2015
Memory
2 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
3%
Pixel Fillrate
7.632 GPixel/s
3%
Texture Fillrate
30.53 GTexel/s
4%
FP32
732.7 GFLOPS
3%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
GeForce 920M Mar 13th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT Oct 28th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2015 | Released | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Navi II (RX 6000) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
33 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
